傲慢与偏见精选的英语读后感

　　导语：傲慢与偏见是一本著名的国外名著，他给我们讲述了：男女主角爱情上的障碍，但在现实社会中也是人们相互之间交流的障碍，更是在正确对待自己，对待事物上的绊脚石。在现实生活中，我们也会经常因为自己单方面的想法而是自己与他人隔开，所以我们要克服“傲慢与偏见”，主动了解他人。那就把它记录下来，编写成英语范文吧，欢迎阅读，仅供参考，更多相关的知识，请关注CNFLA学习网的栏目!

　　傲慢与偏见读后感:

　　When I read the university have the opportunity to see "pride and prejudice", but say a word in heart, I don't think how good this book at the time, even only look at the very beginning, on the one side thought: language is so poor, nor exciting story, how can become the world's classics?

　　This time I am in accidentally get the book, because the owner of the book is highly recommended, suspicious, I decided to finish see later for the book next own conclusion. Under this idea to promote sleep I spent some time to read it, and perceptions of it changes greatly. I here the so-called change, though, does not mean completely, completely changed the original view. What I call the change, is now only to find that it is not without merit.

　　Let's say I find advantages. Look from the style, it has difference, there is no doubt about it, most of the book from the point of view of the male world, even the "Jane eyre" and "wuthering heights", is basically to write from the perspective of men, and "pride and prejudice" is obviously is filled with the thought of women, including world outlook and way of life. That best reflect on writing content: if be the male writers, write most of the work has a breathtaking colors (just strength some problems), and in this book, the most exciting period of also however is wickham elopement with Elizabeth's younger sister (and ending is not sad), the authors could think of the worst ways, only some simple interpersonal deception; Through the full text of the mother how to marry her daughter a thing. A series of facts, is the book of the feminine, and these books at that time, of course, very few, so I think it was a great success of this book.

　　A good novel should be able to reflect the style of an era, in this regard, the book is quite successful. Reading this book, it is easy to form in the mind of the European social status of women - all women to marry out as a kind of honor, and no matter who marry, marry marry women only aim in life, the true feelings is rare, and difficult to be understood, the author deeply exposing and criticizing it is these.

　　As far as weaknesses, I want to compared with other instructive: in terms of the ability of using language, it is not as good as "the count of monte cristo"; As for the story twists and turns of richness, it not as good as "gone with the wind"; At the height of the social reality, it is less than "how the steel was tempered"; In terms of characters psychological description, it inferior to wuthering heights. Although these defects is largely decided by it to describe the social reality of, but a masterpiece of so many loopholes, after all, is too far.

　　After reading this book, I very want to and it completely "gone with the wind" of the contrast. The two books in the story content, development of the plot is too similar, even character selection: corresponding darcy rhett, Elizabeth corresponds to scarlett, corresponding Vichy bentley and Jane correspond to Melanie. Relationship between were made by feelings before freezing to warming, to enthusiastic; The latter two feelings are consistent. The only difference is that the former is set in peace, the latter for war as the background. So I called "pride and prejudice" and "gone with the wind", just think, let the bentley in troubled times, he is bound to be like the Vichy ceremony down and out. Vichy ritual at the beginning, on the other hand, is also a very respectable gentleman.

　　But in the feelings of intense struggle and transformation, "pride and prejudice" couldn't compared with "gone with the wind", "gone with the wind" is set in the war, so conflict natural and easy performance, especially the grand scene of war (such as Atlanta rout, north army siege), the scenes are so exciting, so that the readers of hilarity. These for pride and prejudice is unable to reach the artistic effect. For the war and the postwar social problem, "gone with the wind" also all performance was a success, so the state of the book is by children affair sublimation for the profound thinking to the country and the society, these are the lack of "pride and prejudice".

　　From the perspective of the artistic quality of the whole book, "pride and prejudice" is not as good as gone with the wind. But that indeed it is not difficult to find that after deep thinking, it's not hard to understand. Austin as a female writer, there is no too many people agree that this is, of course, the woman writer on the many writing to less than male writers. Although I can forgive these deficiencies, but relative to the same woman writer charlotte and Emily, Austin also apparently have these aspects. So I still believe that "pride and prejudice" there are many people, but maugham referred to it as one of the world's ten famous novels are exaggerated.

　　参考翻译：

　　在我读大学的时候就有机会看《傲慢与偏见》，但说句心里话，当时我并不认为这本书有多好，甚至只看了个开头就放到了一边，心想：语言如此贫乏，故事又无激动人心之处，怎么会成为世界名著呢?

　　这次我是在偶然间弄到这本书，由于书的主人极力推荐，我满腹狐疑，才决定看完之后再对此书下一个自己的定论。在这种想法推动下，我花了一些睡觉时间将它看完，于是对它的看法大为改观。不过，我这里所谓的改观，并非指完完全全、彻彻底底地改变了原先的看法。我所谓的改观，是指现在才发现它并非毫无优点。

　　先说说我发现的优点吧。从风格上看，它有与众不同之处，这是毫无疑问的，大多数书都是从男性的角度看世界，即使是《简·爱》和《呼啸山庄》，也基本上从男性的角度来写，而《傲慢与偏见》则明显地充满了女性思想色彩，包括世界观及生活方式。这一点在写作内容上得到最好体现：假如是男作家，写出的作品大多具有惊险色彩(只是强弱一些的问题)，而本书中，最激动人心的一段也不过是威克姆与伊丽莎白之妹私奔(而且结局并不悲惨)，作者能想到的最恶劣的行径，也只是一些人与人之间的简单欺骗;贯穿全文的一件事就是母亲如何嫁女儿。这一系列的事实，都表现了这本书的女性化，而这类书在那个时代当然极少，所以我认为这是本书极大的成功之处。

　　一部好的小说应当可以反映一个时代的风貌，就这一点而言，此书也表现得相当成功。读了这本书，头脑中不难形成当时欧洲女性社会的.状况——所有女子都以嫁出去作为一种荣誉，而不管嫁给谁，婚娶成了妇女唯一的人生目标，真正的感情既少见，又难以被理解，作者深刻揭露与批判的正是这些。

　　谈到缺点，我想与其他书作比较：就运用语言的能力而言，它不及《基督山伯爵》;就故事的曲折丰富性而言，它不及《乱世佳人》;就表现社会现实的高度而言，它不及《钢铁是怎样炼成的》;就人物心理描写而言，它不及《呼啸山庄》。虽然这些缺陷很大程度上是由它要描写的社会现实决定的，但一本名著出现这么多的漏洞，毕竟是太过分了。

　　读完这本书，我极想将它与《乱世佳人》进行完全深入的对比。这两本书在故事内容，情节发展上太相似了，就连人物选取也如出一辙：达西对应瑞德，伊丽莎白对应斯佳丽，宾利对应维希礼，简对应媚兰。前两者间关系都由感情封冻到暖化，再到热烈;后两者的感情则始终如一。唯一不同之处是，前者以和平为背景，后者以战争为背景。所以我将《傲慢与偏见》称为和平版《乱世佳人》，试想，让宾利处在乱世，他必然会与维希礼一样落魄。相反，维希礼在开始时也是十分体面的绅士。

　　但在感情的激烈斗争与转化上，《傲慢与偏见》完全无法与《乱世佳人》对比，《乱世佳人》以战争为背景，那么感情冲突自然容易表现，尤其是战争的宏大场面(例如亚特兰大溃退，北军围城)，这一幕幕都是如此激动人心，以至于读者难以释卷。这些对《傲慢与偏见》来说是无法达到的艺术效果。对整场战争及战后的社会问题，《乱世佳人》也都表现得很成功，于是这本书的境界也就由儿女私情升华为对国家、对社会的深刻思索，这些也是《傲慢与偏见》的匮乏的东西。

　　从整本书的艺术性来看，《傲慢与偏见》的确不及《乱世佳人》。但这在深刻思索后的确不难发现，也不难理解。奥斯丁作为女作家，并无太多人赞同，这当然造成了女作家在许多写作才能上不及男作家。尽管我可以原谅这些不足，但相对于同样的女作家夏洛蒂与艾米莉，奥斯丁也显然有这些方面不足。所以至今我还坚信，《傲慢与偏见》的确有许多过人之处，但毛姆将它列为世界十大著名小说之一就未免言过其实了。